OpenNASA
« Back To OpenNASA

John Pritchard

User Profile Image John Pritchard
Member since : Feb-08-2010 (Verified)
5 Ideas, 31 Comments, 82 Votes
Zip Code 07737

Ideas Posted

Hello,

Login Sessions

Seems like login sessions are less than an hour or two. Using the site would be more convenient if they were a week or even two.

Login Input Dialog

The tab from username (email) to password skips to browser bar url rather than "remember me" and then "login" button (on Safari).

Best wishes,
John
NASA and other space agencies and engineering organizations around the world have been continuously exploring methods and tools for collaborative effort. Space flight systems in particular are among the most complex and demanding engineering projects in the human experience.

Half the problems for review or solution in collaboration involve organizational structures and principles. While the other half involve methods and tools. One dynamic between the two may be described as tools being the capability of the organization: an organization can only implement methods for which practical and effective tools are available.

Knowledge based Engineering has been an active field in academia for decades. Aerospace engineering tools have benefitted from this work, including DS CATIA and other federated (centralized server) systems.

The development of the internet in the web has many lessons to offer, as well. Some mirror the lessons offered in academic and commercial work (federation), and through the analysis of activity and deduction of ideas.

Recently NASA and ESA have been working on Concurrent Engineering methods and tools to integrate team effort on complex systems problems. The problem being solved by a Concurrent Engineering methodology is the collection of diverse dependencies across a systemic complex for solution by the multidisciplinary team. In simpler cases, one person can get a system in mind for solution to the complex, sorting problems and solutions for a best fit result. In space flight systems the number of disciplines required prohibits this approach. A diverse team must work together on the problem complex to produce a solution complex for the resulting system. Predominantly there's a communication problem implied by this activity, as one team member expresses the character and significance of a known dependency or recognized conflict to the other interested members of the team.

Moving forward into NASA's new vision, there may be opportunities for more incremental collaboration between individuals, teams and organizations. The increasingly incremental collaboration shares increasingly smaller problems for evaluation and contribution. The goal of the approach is to minimize the marginal cost of collaboration. As a result, the marginal cost of engineering is expected to follow.

It is made possible by a knowledge based system. The knowledge based system organizes each engineering artifact and planning and design detail item into a homogeneous framework for an open variety of tools to access. The planning process includes organization of the objective, workflow, design and development of the project. The design process may include multiple solutions to the objective problem, each elaborating the objective knowledge with an independent avenue for development. Likewise, development work elaborates upon design knowledge.

Knowledge based systems are very powerful, but require an information architecture to succeed. Some knowledge systems are more convenient than others. Convenience and flexibility are critical to success.

The web could be conceived of as a collection of knowledge based systems. Certainly great exemplars of the conception are numerous. The integration of shared activity is well known and fairly well understood.

With concurrent engineering efforts, teams integrate. With knowledge based tools, integration can be increasingly incremental.

For example in this website, proposals are made in an hour and votes are cast in a minute. This level of incremental integration of effort is available to engineering via knowledge based tools.

The effort required to post an update may be hours or days, but is independent of the method, tools, and what can be accomplished in a variety of domains both open and closed.

The key idea in knowledge based engineering is that all project data is homologated and centralized for the benefit of tooling. Tools are oriented to a unified central process.

One example of such a system is a software code repository, another example is a website like this one, and of course DS CATIA and many systems work with centralized data stores.

The world of Google APIs is an example of how a unified data homologation (GData) benefits an open, expanding and evolving range of tools.

The idea is not new, but applying the idea to NASA's new vision requires work.

Certainly the open source software world can contribute with live examples and make the web a more interesting place.

Comments Posted

John Pritchard 5 months ago
These introductions and developments can be further facilitated through common policies, well known for collaboration.
John Pritchard 6 months ago
I like the negative range of the domain, doubles the space. Maybe it means "web site design ideas" :)
John Pritchard 6 months ago
(Login tabbing done)
John Pritchard 6 months ago
I keep some handy things on a google profile, http://www.google.com/profiles/john.douglas.pritchard
John Pritchard 6 months ago
It's all good work, no worries!
The more dedicated one is, the nuttier it gets.
Which is a good thing, most of the time. Here it should be good.
Just work.
No one's complaining.
John Pritchard 6 months ago
Well, I have to say that my thought is to drop the part about NASA putting its people outside, generally. I think that's too much too soon. There's incremental ways to go down the road, one decade at a time, that are less costly and intrusive. And I those tools aren't really here today.
John Pritchard 6 months ago
My dream applications for telemetry would include a 3D flight display, as well as possibly directing a Big Camera Cube Sat for still photos of stars, earth, and other space craft.
http://blog.syntelos.com/2010/02/cube-sat-web.html
(big fun)
John Pritchard 6 months ago
Yes, the voting is only a workflow. In google or other views it may reveal more.
It's a tool, works in a way.
John Pritchard 6 months ago
Login redirects away from a url as in email.
John Pritchard 6 months ago
Last week I was wishing there was a ULA telemetry multicast for the SDO Centaur. The ULA TLM display was on NASA TV the public and launch channels as a live 3D of Earth and Centaur + SDO with orbital parameters. Unfortunately I missed part of the live video broadcast when the public channel cut to ISS & STS-130.

I guess the TDRS ground network might publish a multicast feed.

https://www.spacecomm.nasa.gov/spacecomm/programs/tdrsS/

Otherwise the data is on Celestrak and NASA regularly publishes elements.

John Pritchard 6 months ago
Hi Shirell,
Many thanks for your most generous remarks.
My post reflects my own work, in open source, with lessons learned through participation in some space related internet groups. I'm very interested in working on problems in open participation engineering for space flight systems.
As a post reflecting a great deal of time in study and development, it is admittedly dense. This is plainly a fault in my presentation.
I'm going to revise the article into more of an essay format from its abstract format.
Thanks,
John
John Pritchard 6 months ago
Yes, understandably hard to implement but a good idea. May have project oriented views or perspectives that could make the implementation problem more tractable.
John Pritchard 6 months ago
Should we discuss merit or person? Being available to the evolution of one's own ideas is important, too.

In my own case, this past year I've undertaken a self guided tour of some space studies and the massive complexity of these multidisciplinary projects. Having studied Economics and Computer Science in school, I'm not a stranger to complexity. However, one can only learn about the world and history and politics and ways and means. It's always bigger than any one person can comprehend.

For my part, I find NASA perfectly capable of solving the kinds of problems you've raised, which is why I've not been able to vote in favor -- and have elected to vote against in that case.

The hard problems are in the neighborhood of what next, and how.

Much of the discussion concerns opening NASA, an issue of some historic proportion. The big problems include items like: ways and reasons for controlling information.

Security issues as addressed by ITAR are real, in their own right. No one wants to see global craziness marked by flying cars filled with explosives. The wheeled kind are bad enough.

However, there's a trade off in that, too. If US persons are unable to work on real rocket engines in the way they may prefer, in some cases in open source -- publicly on the internet -- then a great deal of ambition, energy, opportunity and development is lost to us.

So where's the significances and where's the optimal trade, and why? For example, when is security only keeping honest people from doing what they could or should be doing -- while others do what they want anyway? Are we only satisfying lawyers? Do we need those constraints?

And in other ways, some of the big issues are what a software engineer might call technological housekeeping. Plenty of valuable information is not accessible because it's on a shelf or not presentable. Takes time and effort to "open".

So how can we solve the big issues? How can the general public community help NASA in ways that are unique?
John Pritchard 6 months ago
I think there's an idea here, but it needs some development. I think this idea is best rolled into a general open nasa idea that starts with private industry like Scaled, Space-X and Masten; includes Universities and others including me and you and hackspaces, and everyone.

There's lots of ideas in this site that are in this general vein. Open data, open software, open processes and budgets and everything.

I think that all of this is a completely rational view of the future general space economy, and how to get there from here.

The question is, what can NASA do to help us get there. I think there's a couple key ideas that seem to me to be enveloped by the new vision, a traditional NACA/NASA R&D and testing and spaceflight role that deals with the road we as a nation have travelled to date. A lot of hard work, heads down, needs to be opened up. Which is really hard to do.
John Pritchard 6 months ago
Here's the SPHERES-NET RFI
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=def9ae35c237359f0bc75dd730e8ed54&tab=core&_cview=0&cck=1&au=&ck=
John Pritchard 6 months ago
Hi,
I suppose this category fits least well.
Thanks,
John
John Pritchard 6 months ago
Already done, no?
John Pritchard 6 months ago
Yea, I like it. A longer term, pure aerospace X Prize. $20M is always compelling for more grass roots inspiration in math and science.
John Pritchard 6 months ago
Oh, I liked this idea until the kids needed to campaign for themselves. I don't think this part is good. It's too far in one direction. Simply cutting that part would reveal a perfectly fine idea with a lot of value.

The kids could be given one summer of group activities, followed by the next summer of self selected specialized activity. For example, astrodynamics, robotics, astronomy, aerodynamics, etc.. This is a more involved program, but maybe not unmanageable.
John Pritchard 6 months ago
Not easy to do well, be very doable.
John Pritchard 6 months ago
I like the essential idea, which is a fit with open data and clean data interfaces.
John Pritchard 6 months ago
I see your point, and I do agree with your direction. Like
http://www.federalbudget.com/
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/
with agency drill down. Certainly "per state" probably has been done.

John Pritchard 6 months ago
Yes, definitely. There's more to be done.
John Pritchard 6 months ago
There's tons. Don't see how petabytes of stuff is useful. The part that's interesting is mostly online already in technical reports, and then there's the ITAR problem which is currently evolving..
John Pritchard 6 months ago
Not clear how sharing NASA budget items is opening knowledge and not creating politics.
John Pritchard 6 months ago
Problem solved many times, in all dimensions.
My fave, USGS ISIS for LRO data.
John Pritchard 6 months ago
The engineering time cost may be one of the most important problems to solve, here. Engineers / comments need to be qualified, because many ~will~ comment without thinking -- in my experience. Systems and perspectives are among the issues, not to mention level of motivation or character of purpose or intention.

A "concurrent / knowledge based engineering" system that makes it terribly convenient to sort the wheat from the chaff and make a meaningful contribution in a minute or an hour - is critical.
John Pritchard 6 months ago
Universities are a great "top rationale" for a more open source engineering for NASA, which can begin with incremental work items between public and private sectors, concurrent / knowledge based engineering systems, general itar safety, and then opening that up to universities and others (as for SPHERES-NET and many other community development projects).
John Pritchard 6 months ago
There's not enough enforcement of the policy that government work products are the property of the people. (My own language, not right, but there is a policy in that direction).
John Pritchard 6 months ago
Solved problem, call Space-X, et al. NASA opened ranges like the Midatlantic Spaceport. The ground work on this subject has been laid down.
John Pritchard 6 months ago
Good basic idea: hackerspace recognition and inclusion. Problem with implementational details, if it were actually done this way, the hackspaces would need to raising prices.

The SPHERES-NET contract on DARPA like many other similar initiatives illustrate the development of inclusion.

Opening the aerospace industry is going to be a long road. A place to start is increasing incremental collaboration between private and public sectors for small work items through concurrent & knowledge based engineering methods.